Re: display of CP-1258
Hello Edmund,
On Wednesday, February 4, 2004 at 9:40:51 AM +0000, Edmund Grimley-Evans wrote:
> This patch is not (yet) a proposed solution, but it does make this
> particular problem disappear and is evidence for the problem being
> what I suspect it is.
It "works": I get 2 readable lines. But the first next char (an 'u')
got eaten: I get "v?x", not "v?ux" in place of "v½ux". Again the 'u'
disappears when mail is either CP-1255 or CP-1258, not others.
Bye! Alain.
--
Give your computer's unused idle processor cycles to a scientific goal:
The Genome@home project at <URL:http://genomeathome.stanford.edu/>.