Re: is it send.c or sendlib.c ?

To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: is it send.c or sendlib.c ?
From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu <ttakah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 00:28:20 +0900
In-reply-to: <20040123144722.GA37315@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
References: <20040123144722.GA37315@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i

On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Tweax Daemon wrote:
> But can't seem to figure out which of the two handles the 
> quoting when repling back to mails.

send.c has include_reply() and generate_body().

-- 
tamo

References:
- is it send.c or sendlib.c ?
  - From: Tweax Daemon

Prev by Date: [2004-01-24] CVS repository changes
Next by Date: Re: PATCH: index_context: like pager_context
Previous by thread: is it send.c or sendlib.c ?
Next by thread: [2004-01-24] CVS repository changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread