On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 05:29:08PM -0800, Chris Cutler wrote: > Mostly I'm writing to inquire whether there has been further (since the > time of the above thread) progress on this problem. Most Mutters don't use IMAP, so no, it hasn't been attacked any further AFAIK. > Also, if anyone > thinks I ought to avoid this problem like the plague lest it drive me > mad and make me tear my hair out, such warnings would be appreciated. I believe that's the case, since Mutt is single-threaded, so there'd be no way for Mutt to fetch the rest of the messages in the background while displaying the current screenful ... unless you mean for Mutt to fetch the currently-visible messages only, and wait for you to scroll before fetching more (which to me at least would be far more annoying, since I tend to keep my Mutt open for over a month at a time, now that I have my IMAP keepaliver working flawlessly). . . - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpet5qgYvvZ4.pgp
Description: PGP signature