bug#1488: marked as done (Mail-Followup-To should use Reply-To address rather than From address)
Your message dated Sun, 4 Jan 2004 11:06:34 +0100
with message-id <20040104100634.GD9799@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
and subject line bug#1488: [PATCH] set mail-followup-to from reply-to
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Herr der Kaefer
(administrator, GUUG bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.guug.de; 26 Feb 2003 12:54:08 +0000
>From md@xxxxxxxx Wed Feb 26 13:54:08 2003
Received: from attila.bofh.it ([213.92.8.2] ident=postfix)
by trithemius.gnupg.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18o14P-000804-00
for <submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:53:58 +0100
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 4AB5E5F79B; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:55:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix/Md, from userid 1001)
id D568133B70; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:54:57 +0100 (CET)
From: Marco d'Itri <md@xxxxxxxx>
To: submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Mail-Followup-To should use Reply-To address rather than From address
X-GUUG-CC: 182526@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-Id: <20030226125457.D568133B70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:54:57 +0100 (CET)
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.3-3
Severity: normal
[NOTE: this bug report has been submitted to the debian BTS as Bug#182526.
Please Cc all your replies to 182526@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx .]
From: Peter Palfrader <weasel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Mail-Followup-To should use Reply-To address rather than From address
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:25:42 +0100
Say I have a mailinglist configured in lists:
} lists mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx
Now I compose mail to this list with
| From: from@xxxxxxxxxxx
| Reply-to: replyto@xxxxxxxxxxx
| To: mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx
mutt builds the following header:
| Mail-Followup-To: <from@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In my opinion if should really use the reply-to address if it exists:
| Mail-Followup-To: <replyto@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx>
TIA,
[severity varies from wishlist to normal, I've set normal]
Peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred. | : :' : The universal
| `. `' Operating System
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `- http://www.debian.org/
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 1488-done) by bugs.guug.de; 4 Jan 2004 10:04:15 +0000
>From roessler+bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sun Jan 04 11:04:11 2004
Received: from does-not-exist.info ([217.160.221.198]
helo=kamino.does-not-exist.org)
by trithemius.gnupg.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ad57D-0003il-00
for <1488-done@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 11:04:11 +0100
Received: from voyager.does-not-exist.org (p3E9B9DFA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
[62.155.157.250])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by kamino.does-not-exist.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8596E3141A3; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 11:06:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: by voyager.does-not-exist.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
id A627B8076; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 11:06:34 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 11:06:34 +0100
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Michael Elkins <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>, 1488-done@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 182526@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: bug#1488: [PATCH] set mail-followup-to from reply-to
Message-ID: <20040104100634.GD9799@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20031216005535.GA24845@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031216005535.GA24845@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-109.0 required=4.0
tests=AWL,BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT,
USER_IN_WHITELIST
autolearn=ham version=2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
Thanks, committed to the CVS.
On 2003-12-15 16:55:35 -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
> From: Michael Elkins <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: 1488@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 182526@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:55:35 -0800
> Subject: bug#1488: [PATCH] set mail-followup-to from reply-to
> Reply-To: Michael Elkins <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>, 1488@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> X-Spam-Level:
>
> >From: Peter Palfrader <weasel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Mail-Followup-To should use Reply-To address rather than From
> >address
> >Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:25:42 +0100
> >
> >Say I have a mailinglist configured in lists:
> >
> >} lists mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >Now I compose mail to this list with
> >| From: from@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >| Reply-to: replyto@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >| To: mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >mutt builds the following header:
> >
> >| Mail-Followup-To: <from@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >In my opinion if should really use the reply-to address if it exists:
> >
> >| Mail-Followup-To: <replyto@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The attached patch should fix this problem.
>
> me
> --- send.c~ 2003-12-15 16:50:35.000000000 -0800
> +++ send.c 2003-12-15 16:53:57.000000000 -0800
> @@ -861,7 +861,7 @@
> {
> if (e->reply_to)
> from = rfc822_cpy_adr (e->reply_to);
> - if (e->from)
> + else if (e->from)
> from = rfc822_cpy_adr (e->from);
> else
> from = mutt_default_from ();
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>