Um, okay ... go figure ... I attach it, and it works perfectly fine even within Mutt. . . The original email still doesn't work within Mutt, though, and that's really annoying. I can post screenshots, if anybody's interested. - Dave On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 12:55:05PM -0500, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > Oh, whoops ... by the time I attached the file, my debugging setup had > already overwritten the file with a new message. This time, I believe > I'm attaching the right one. (My email address is also broken in the > middle of coloring, I just noticed, BTW.) > > - Dave > > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 12:45:51PM -0500, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > > I submitted a bug report a while ago stating an earlier problem I > > had with Mutt's pager clobbering my ANSI escape sequences even when > > allow_ansi was set. Since then, I've discovered that the behavoir doesn't > > just trigger on newlines, as the attached file (generated by my latest > > displayfilter configuration, utilizing a 100% XML pipeline) clearly shows. > > Try viewing it within Mutt, and you'll notice that the colors in the > > URLs in particular are badly screwed up. If you view it using cat or > > more, though, you'll see that the ANSI sequences are in fact correct. > > (You can look at it in less and see the escape sequences directly, > > if you don't believe cat and more.) > > > > Is there a chance that somebody might be interested in fixing the thing? > > AFAICT, allow_ansi should essentially just let the filtered email just > > control the terminal directly with the ANSI sequences, rather than > > constantly killing off escape sequences prematurely. (Otherwise, what's > > the point of allow_ansi in the first place?) > > > > Thanks, > > - Dave > > > > -- > > Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? > > It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? > > > > Please visit this link: > > http://rotter.net/israel > > > Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 12:43:38 -0500 (EST) > > From: Asif Iqbal <[33miqbala@xxxxxxxxxxx[0;;0m> > > Subject: Re: Sortign Issue > > X-X-Sender: [33miqbala@qmail[0;;0m > > To: Zbynek Houska <[33mzbynh@xxxxxxxxx[0;;0m> > > > > On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Zbynek Houska wrote: > > > > > Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 00:44:47 +0100 > > > From: Zbynek Houska <[33mzbynh@xxxxxxxxx[0;;0m> > > > To: Mutt Users List <[33mmutt-users@xxxxxxxx[0;;0m> > > > Subject: Re: Sortign Issue > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 06:22:38PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote: > > > > If I use > > > > > > > > set sort=reverse-date-recieved I loose thred. I like to keep the thread > > > > along > > > > with the reverse-date. How do I do that ? > > > > > > > Hope it helps you :-) > > > > > > folder-hook . set sort=reverse-threads > > > > > > > I like keep the threads as it is, but just sort by reverse arrival. I can > > do it > > fine in Pine. Basically I do not want to go the last page to see the latest > > email. At the same time I like see the mails as original than replies in > > that > > order. In Pine I choose reverse-arrival and show threads, that does exactly > > what > > I want > > > > Thanks > > > > > Zbynek > > > > > > > -- > > Asif Iqbal > > [32mhttp://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8B686E08[0;;0m > > There's no place like 127.0.0.1 > > > > > -- > Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? > It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? > > Please visit this link: > http://rotter.net/israel > Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 09:29:34 -0500 > Subject: Re: muttquery > To: Mutt Users List <[33mmutt-users@xxxxxxxx[0;;0m> > > [35mGPG[0;;0m: [31mDave Cohen[0;;0m > <[33mdave@[0;;0m[31mdave.tj[0;;0m>: > On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 04:01:51AM -0500, [31mDavid Yitzchak Cohen[0;;0m > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 06:51:12PM +1100, Ricky Buchanan wrote: > > > > Anyway, have situations in OTHER programs where I have to look up email > > > addresses, on occasion, and it'd be REALLY handy if instead of looking > > > up and getting the output like this: > > > > > > Searching through 475 addresses in pilot address book. > > > [33mfrayah@xxxxxxxxxxx[0;;0m Anne Oberin > > > [33mrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx[0;;0m Penguin Ricky Buchanan > > > [33mColin.Oberin@xxxxxxxxxx[0;;0m Colin Oberin Dad Father > > > [33mkase@xxxxxxxx[0;;0m Hayden Oberin > > > [33mkaysik@xxxxxxxxxx[0;;0m Ptolemy Oberin > > > > > > Then for cases where there's >1 entry, I'd like mutt's > > > query-answer-choosing program to come up, let me choose the answer, and > > > return it to stdout like, for example > > > > > > [33mrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx[0;;0m > > > > > > still using the previous example. And, like with mutt, in the previous > > > example it would automatically choose and return one address if the > > > query program returned only one. > > > > > > Possible to do/access from the command line? > > Well, I got bored, so I made a program to do just that. The only > thing is, it depends on the dialog program to do the actual work. > (The dialog program is the UI backbone of Slackware's setup system, > and is easily available online.) > > The source code may be found here: > [32mhttp://www.[0;;0m[31mbigfatdave.com[0;;0m[32m/dave/bin/selection_box.c[0;;0m > > ...and an i686 (glibc 2.3.2) precompiled version is here: > [32mhttp://www.[0;;0m[31mbigfatdave.com[0;;0m[32m/dave/bin/selection_box[0;;0m > > To use it, simply pipe your $query_command into it. It accepts up to > BUFFERS-1 lines of input, where each line can be of the form "option" > or "option<tab>explanation" and the special case of "option<tab>" is > handled correctly, so the input can easily be autogenerated without you > having to do too many of your own checks. If you'd like a friendly > message to appear at the top of the menu, make it the only argument > to selection_box. If no input lines are found, selection_box prints > nothing to stdout. If one input line is found, it'll print the option > (without the explanation) to stdout without calling dialog. Otherwise, > it'll call dialog with the appropriate arguments. > > Enjoy, > - Dave > > -- > Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? > It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? > > Please visit this link: > [32mhttp://rotter.net/israel[0;;0m > [35mGPG[0;;0m: fin -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpq9YFs72UeP.pgp
Description: PGP signature