On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 06:03:22PM +0100, GUUG bug Tracking System wrote: > On 2003-12-07 12:26:48 +0100, Artur R.Czechowski wrote: > > It seems mutt always picks the same filename when autoviewing > > HTML mime parts, /tmp/mutt.html. Depending on how careful it is > > about opening the file, this could result in all sorts of > > trouble. Suggest using tmpfile(3) or something similar instead. > > mutt is as careful about opening that file as it is about opening a > temporary file whose name was generated using tmpfile -- in fact, > when mutt.html is not available, mutt will use a tmpfile-like > mechanism for making up a new file name. [-- Automuestra usando lynx -dump -force-html '/tmp/muttrUpdTk' --] and: $ LC_ALL=C ls -ld /tmp/mutt.html ls: /tmp/mutt.html: No such file or directory would seem to indicate that some sort of tmpfile-like mechanism is used anyway. - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpCZvEX7NNkU.pgp
Description: PGP signature