<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: ^R / ^D and threads



On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:43:11AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:

> On 2003-11-14 01:51:07 -0500, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote:
> 
> > I'd rather rewrite all my "set resolve=blablabla" statements into
> > something like `makemuttrc set resolve=blablabla` and have
> > makemuttrc produce the set code and update its own saved version
> > of the old one. That way, you can restore it using something like
> > `makemuttrc restore resolve`.  (I'm actually leaning towards the
> > possibility of writing a full-blown version of such a
> > script/program, as it'll really simplify many of my Mutt RC
> > files.  Has anybody else done something similar already?)
> 
> It might be easier to implement a per-variable stack,

...you mean, within Mutt itself?

That'd certainly be useful for these types of cases.  It'd make my
makemuttrc script a lot simpler; that's for sure :-)

 - Dave

-- 
Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor?
It's simple, Skyler.  You've seen what food processors do to food, right?

Please visit this link:
http://rotter.net/israel

Attachment: pgpBbKJ4qAOHi.pgp
Description: PGP signature