On 2003-11-14 01:51:07 -0500, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > I'd rather rewrite all my "set resolve=blablabla" statements into > something like `makemuttrc set resolve=blablabla` and have > makemuttrc produce the set code and update its own saved version > of the old one. That way, you can restore it using something like > `makemuttrc restore resolve`. (I'm actually leaning towards the > possibility of writing a full-blown version of such a > script/program, as it'll really simplify many of my Mutt RC > files. Has anybody else done something similar already?) It might be easier to implement a per-variable stack, so you could do something like this: push resolve set resolve=yes exec delete-thread pop resolve Thoughts? -- Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.
Attachment:
pgp1vjFBB6XV7.pgp
Description: PGP signature