On 2003-11-14 01:51:07 -0500, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote:
> I'd rather rewrite all my "set resolve=blablabla" statements into
> something like `makemuttrc set resolve=blablabla` and have
> makemuttrc produce the set code and update its own saved version
> of the old one. That way, you can restore it using something like
> `makemuttrc restore resolve`. (I'm actually leaning towards the
> possibility of writing a full-blown version of such a
> script/program, as it'll really simplify many of my Mutt RC
> files. Has anybody else done something similar already?)
It might be easier to implement a per-variable stack, so you could
do something like this:
push resolve
set resolve=yes
exec delete-thread
pop resolve
Thoughts?
--
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.
Attachment:
pgp1vjFBB6XV7.pgp
Description: PGP signature