Re: mutt_free_header -> free -> mutt_sort_headers -> segfault
On 2003-11-08 10:05:37 +0900, qhwt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> IIRC, you'll have better chance to reproduce this bug if you set
> sorting mode to threads,
That's what I tried.
> because this bug has been there since incremental-threading code
> came in (note: I'm not trying to blame the incremental-threading
> code or the person who implemented it). But I haven't managed to
> fix this anyway.
This is not about blaming, but about tracking down the problem.
Regards,
--
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.