Re: mutt_free_header -> free -> mutt_sort_headers -> segfault

[Mads Martin Joergensen <mmj@xxxxxxx>]

* Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [Nov 07. 2003 10:59]:
> On 2003-11-05 20:09:18 -0000, q4xk3j002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > what next?
> 
> Good question.  At this point, the same code produces a NULL pointer
> dereference, but works for me.  That doesn't make it terribly easy
> to debug.
> 
> Is anyone else able to reproduce the problem and narrow it down?

Did anyone produce a mailbox to reproduce with, or do we have to use gdb
still?

-- 
Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk
"Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic
 and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?"
                                -- A. P. J.