[IP] Senate Commerce Committee reprive for broadcast flag, net neutrality decisions
Begin forwarded message:
From: Bob Frankston <Bob2-19-0501@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: June 22, 2006 4:35:55 PM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx, ip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [IP] Senate Commerce Committee reprive for broadcast
flag, net neutrality decisions
If the price of NN is the Broadcast Flag I'll take a pass on
legislating NN
and trust the marketpalce. The Broadcast Flag is a direct attack on the
marketplace by making innovation a federal offense.
http://www.frankston.com
-----Original Message-----
From: David Farber [mailto:dave@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 16:19
To: ip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [IP] Senate Commerce Committee reprive for broadcast flag, net
neutrality decisions
Begin forwarded message:
From: Ethan Ackerman <eackerma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: June 22, 2006 4:12:38 PM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Senate Commerce Committee reprive for broadcast flag, net
neutrality decisions
Greetings Dave,
Perhaps begining to realize just how big a bite it has taken on sooo
many contentious issues related to telecom reform, the Senate Commerce
Committee hearing scheduled for today just adjourned. The Committee
had made it less than one-tenth of the way through its markup of
S.2686, the Senate's version of the telecom. reform bill.
The two concerns most dear to the technology community, 'net
neutrality' and 'broadcast flag' issues, weren't addressed, and it
doesn't look like they will be until next week at the earliest.
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as BobIP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-
people/
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/