[IP] worth reading A REPLY FROM Vixie on Neustar to create their own DNS root and own universe to rule
Begin forwarded message:
From: Paul Vixie <paul@xxxxxxx>
Date: October 1, 2005 10:44:02 AM EDT
To: "Strata R. Chalup" <strata@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Fwd: [IP] more on Neustar to create their own DNS root
and own universe to rule
strata,
someone was kind enough to forward this to me. note that i no longer
work
at MFN (since 2002, that is) and that vixie@xxxxxxxx will no longer
reach me.
dave,
you may forward this to I-P if you find it entertaining or otherwise
useful.
paul
# > From: "Strata R. Chalup" <strata@xxxxxxxxxxx>
# > Date: September 30, 2005 6:47:22 PM EDT
# > To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx, vixie@xxxxxxxx
# > Subject: Re: [IP] more on Neustar to create their own DNS root
and own
# > universe to rule
# >
# > I'm quite curious to hear what Paul Vixie thinks of this. Back
in the
# > early 90's, and then again recently, I floated the idea that bind
should
# > incorporate the idea of alternate root servers. My motivation
was more
# > political than technical-- currently it is frighteningly easy to
make an
# > entire domain disappear, silencing dissent and politically-incorrect
# > points of view. I pointed out that with all of the joyful hype
about the
# > 'net bringing democracy to the masses, it wasn't going to happen
if there
# > was a single hierarchy out of which one could be plucked,
redirected, etc
# > etc.
# >
# > Vixie's response, while eminiently polite, was very passionate:
his vision
# > of the Internet was that it was one space, and support for
alternate roots
# > would destroy this. He added that he would use his considerable
technical
# > and personal resources to squash such a concept if it were
attempted.
# > Given his status as an inventor, coder, and general formative net
entity,
# > I decided to let the matter drop.
# >
# > I think One Root Zone is still a bad idea for all the reasons I
brought up
# > in 1994, 2001, and 2003, plus the additional incentive of general
# > censorship and net-nannyism at a carrier and national policy
level. But
# > 'One Root Zone plus N Portal Zones' is even *worse* than One Root
Zone,
# > for all these *plus* the fiscal misbehavior incentives.
# >
# > Paul, time to buckle on your armor, dude. Somebody out there
(not me!)
# > is pursuing this whole-hog, and has a lotta fiscal incentive, and
deep
# > pockets, to push it through.
# >
# > cheers,
# > Strata
in 2005 i am just as passionate but not always just as polite about
this as
i was in prior years. on http://fm.vix.com/ i repeated some of my
words from
NANOG last week. to wit:
i am not neccesarily an admirer of the US-DoC/ICANN/VeriSign
trinity,
but i work to uphold it in spite of its flaws and my misgivings,
simply because of the end-game mechanics. if any hair-brained
alternate root scheme ever gets traction and starts to be a
force to
be reckoned with, then THAT is when the gold rush will begin.
instead
of a few whacko pirates like new.net and unidt, we'll be buried in
VC-funded "namespace plays". every isp will have to decide
whether to
start one, join one, or stay with the default. most will decide to
outsource or consort, but the money plays and consortia will
come and
go and fail and merge just like telco's and isp's do today. the
losers
will be my children, and everybody else who just wants to type a
URL
they saw on a milk carton into their browser and have it work.
sadly for me, it doesn't always matter to the world what i think.
folks ARE
doing "alternate roots", and mostly not for the democracy-related
reasons you
gave. a note, though. i had the incredible honour of joining martin
varsavsky, dan gilmor, joi ito, david isenberg, and a dozen or so
others in
madrid to talk about internet's effect on democracy. from I-P's
archives:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/200503/
msg00113.html
i strongly recommend a reading, even if it's a re-reading, of "the
infrastructure of democracy" as shown on the above page. and do note
that
i was in total agreement with that consensus position.
however, there's not a lot of overlap between the concept of internet-
enabled
democracy and the concept of alternate roots. having lots of roots
means that
speech is not as free, and that your isp or your government can
connect you to
a namespace that lacks the kind of dissent they don't like, or mis-
answer
your computer's DNS questions in a way that shows you only what they
want you
to see. alternate roots is a goalset not only outside the DNS
protocol but
incompatible with internet-enabled democracy.
that having been said, i'm sometimes a practical man. alternate
roots do
exist, and more will come. i've pondered the meaning of all of this
within
the context of the dns protocol and of my company's open source
implementation
of that protocol, and i think i can see a way to define and support
alternate
roots in a way that will reduce their chaos -- but not their harm.
given that
the US-DoC/VeriSign/ICANN trinity pursuing "a policy contrary to
their own
interests" and that the inevitable result of this will be hundreds if
not
thousands of chaotically interrelated dns namespaces, i'm ready to
consider
ways that DNS and BIND might be extended to make that inevitable
condition less
painful to live in. but if i do it, it will be with rage in my heart
against
those who could have helped us preserve name universality but who
squandered
that opportunity for short term political or financial gain.
oh and one more thing. a small technical matter, insignificant next
to the
democracy-related points you raised. neustar isn't doing anything
wrong--
the "root" they'll operate will only be seen by GPRS cell towers, not by
end-user handsets. end-user GPRS handsets will mostly see content
from .MOBI,
and GSMA (the contracting party for neustar in this case) was a very
strong
member of the consortium who asked for .MOBI. it's not wrong to make a
namespace that's only usable by a closed population-- folks following
RFC1918
do it every day. it's not wrong for neustar to do this. silly,
yes. wrong,
no. it's not necessary and it will cause them more trouble than it
saves
them and it will be used as a template by people who shouldn't follow
it and
it's clearly causing a lot of misunderstanding in forums like I-P...
but it's
not an alternate root in the sense that new.net or unidt are
alternate roots,
and it's probably safe to stop talking about it now.
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/