<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[IP] more on "War on Terra" saves few lives, expert says





Begin forwarded message:

From: Brian Smithson <brian@xxxxxxxx>
Date: September 12, 2005 5:10:47 PM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IP] more on "War on Terra" saves few lives, expert says


Dave,

A comment on a recent IP posting, for IP if you like.

I find it beyond preposterous that anyone can seriously assert that nobody -- NOBODY -- except Tom Clancy forecast the use of a commercial airliner as a suicide attack vehicle.

By itself, the 8/6/2001 PDB "Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in US" should have provided enough connectible dots to forecast such a scenario: (1) intention to conduct terrorist attacks in the US, (2) intention to use operatives who are based in the US, (3) intention to hijack US aircraft, (4) preparations for other kinds of attacks such as surveillance of Federal buildings in NYC, (5) plans to attack using explosives, and even (6) references to the World Trade Center and Washington DC.

Then there were reports of al Qaeda followers seeking flight training in various locations. Why would al Qaeda be doing that? One would need little imagination to figure that out, given their previous suicide attacks using explosive-laden boats.

What else was needed, a frigging flight plan!?

I am sick to death of hearing apologists go on and on about how nobody could have anticipated the tragic disasters that have befallen our current government, from 9/11 to Iraq to NOLA. Such statements ring with the same deafening cognitive dissonance as "nobody anticipated the levees would be breached". I am inclined not to attribute such massive failures to lack of information, coordination, imagination, or capability, but instead I attribute them to refusal to listen, misplaced focus of attention, agenda-driven priorities, and a policy of rewarding blindly loyal dilettantes over competent, experienced experts.

I'm not involved in government or life-critical matters, I am just a lowly technology project manager. But I can say that in my line of work, where failures may only result in some lost revenues or or a tarnished corporate reputation, I would expect to be FIRED ON THE SPOT for such gross incompetence as has been repeatedly displayed by Bush's administration and appointees.

And it is there that I must be lacking in imagination, because I cannot imagine why the highest office in our country and so-called leader of the free world should be held to a lower standard of integrity and competence than I am.



[Ralph Hitchens said...]
Mr. Bray was right about one thing, even if Mr. Fairlie denies it. Only Tom Clancy (in "Debt of Honor," I believe, published in 1994) forecast the use of a commercial airliner in a suicide terrorist exploit. Yes, there have been many airline hijackings in recent decades but to my knowledge no one in the intelligence community (in which I worked for most of the last 20 years) or anywhere else put forward a scenario that resembled Clancy's. Had anyone done so, our counter-terrorism analysts would have had something to work with. It's not likely that an airline pilot could be induced -- even at gunpoint -- to fly into a building, so al-Qaeda would need its own pilots. Flying an airliner is not something you learn at your average flight school; you need to attend one of a relatively small number of major flight schools that provide training in large transport-category jets. Nearly all the students at these schools work for airlines or large corporate operators, as the cost of this training is prohibitive. The Phoenix FBI office had the right idea in its now-famous memo, but it was "too little, too late." Had the Clancy scenario been taken seriously a few years earlier, I have no doubt that the relative handful of unaffiliated students of Middle Eastern origin could have been identified and investigated long before 9/11. Scenario-based forecasting doesn't seem to be widely used in the Intelligence Community, from my experience. It's a domain that places the highest value on inductive reasoning.
Ralph Hitchens


-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/