<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[IP] more on Anyone know if this is for real?





Begin forwarded message:

From: Jeffrey Hunker <jhunker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: July 20, 2005 7:33:54 PM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IP] more on Anyone know if this is for real?


If this isn't real, it should be. Having worked with members of our much maligned intelligence community for some years, I have numerous criticisms of the system, but only a few about its members -- and none about their loyalty and dedication.

What is notable is what no one has yet commented on -- the incredible ability of this Administration to manipulate the truth (or 'spin the media'). In one sense I admire them; in another, I am very very afraid.

Jeffrey Hunker
Professor of Technology Policy
Carnegie Mellon University

jhunker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx




Begin forwarded message:

From: "Casserly, James" <JCasserly@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: July 20, 2005
3:28:50 PM EDT To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [IP] Anyone know if this is
for real?


Believe so.  A .pdf of the letter is at
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/docs/intel.officers.letter.pdf The fellow who
maintains that site, Joshua Micah Marshall, is in my experience quite
reliable.

-----Original Message----- From: owner-ip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-ip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Farber Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 3:20 PM To: Ip ip Subject: [IP] Anyone know if this is for
real?




Begin forwarded message:

From: EEkid@xxxxxxx Date: July 20, 2005 3:12:41 PM EDT To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Anyone know if this is for real?


CIA Agents Letter to US Senate and House


18 July 2005

AN OPEN STATEMENT TO THE LEADERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES AND THE SENATE.

The Honorable Dennis Hastert, Speaker, U.S. House of Representatives

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi, Minority Leader, U.S. House of Representatives


The Honorable Dr. William Frist, Majority Leader of the Senate

The Honorable Harry Reid, Minority Leader of the Senate


We, the undersigned former U.S. intelligence officers are concerned with the tone and substance of the public debate over the ongoing Department of Justice investigation into who leaked the name of Valerie Plame, wife of former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson IV, to syndicated columnist Robert
Novak and other members of the media, which exposed her status as an
undercover CIA officer. The disclosure of Ms. Plame's name was a shameful
event in American history and, in our professional judgment, may have
damaged U.S. national security and poses a threat to the ability of U.S.
intelligence gathering using human sources. Any breach of the code of
confidentiality and cover weakens the overall fabric of intelligence, and, directly or indirectly, jeopardizes the work and safety of intelligence
workers and their sources.

The Republican National Committee has circulated talking points to
supporters to use as part of a coordinated strategy to discredit
Ambassador Joseph Wilson and his wife. As part of this campaign a common
theme is the idea that Ambassador Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame was not
undercover and deserved no protection. The following are four recent
examples of this "talking point":

Michael Medved stated on Larry King Live on July 12, 2005, "And let's be honest about this. Mrs. Plame, Mrs. Wilson, had a desk job at Langley. She
went back and forth every single day."

Victoria Toensing stated on a Fox News program with John Gibson on July 12, 2005 that, "Well, they weren't taking affirmative measures to protect that identity. They gave her a desk job in Langley. You don't really have somebody deep undercover going back and forth to Langley, where people can
see them."

Ed Rodgers, Washington Lobbyist and former Republican official, said on July 13, 2005 on the Newshour with Jim Lehrer, "And also I think it is now a matter of established fact that Mrs. Plame was not a protected covert agent, and I don't think there's any meaningful investigation about that."


House majority whip Roy Blunt (R, Mo), on Face the Nation, July 17, 2005,
"It certainly wouldn't be the first time that the CIA might have been
overzealous in sort of maintaining the kind of top-secret definition on
things longer than they needed to. You know, this was a job that the
ambassador's wife had that she went to every day. It was a desk job. I
think many people in Washington understood that her employment was at the
CIA, and she went to that office every day."

These comments reveal an astonishing ignorance of the intelligence
community and the role of cover. The fact is that there are thousands of U.S. intelligence officers who "work at a desk" in the Washington, D.C. area every day who are undercover. Some have official cover, and some have non-official cover. Both classes of cover must and should be protected.

While we are pleased that the U.S. Department of Justice is conducting an investigation and that the U.S. Attorney General has recused himself, we
believe that the partisan attacks against Valerie Plame are sending a
deeply discouraging message to the men and women who have agreed to work
undercover for their nation's security.

We are not lawyers and are not qualified to determine whether the leakers
technically violated the 1982 Intelligence Identities Protection Act.
However, we are confident that Valerie Plame was working in a cover status and that our nation's leaders, regardless of political party, have a duty to protect all intelligence officers. We believe it is appropriate for the President to move proactively to dismiss from office or administratively
punish any official who participated in any way in revealing Valerie
Plame's status. Such an act by the President would send an unambiguous
message that leaks of this nature will not be tolerated and would be
consistent with his duties as the Commander-in-Chief.

We also believe it is important that Congress speak with one non- partisan voice on this issue. Intelligence officers should not be used as political footballs. In the case of Valerie Plame, she still works for the CIA and is not in a position to publicly defend her reputation and honor. We stand in her stead and ask that Republicans and Democrats honor her service to her country and stop the campaign of disparagement and innuendo aimed at
discrediting Mrs. Wilson and her husband.

Our friends and colleagues have difficult jobs gathering the intelligence, which helps, for example, to prevent terrorist attacks against Americans at home and abroad. They sometimes face great personal risk and must spend long hours away from family and friends. They serve because they love this country and are committed to protecting it from threats from abroad and to defending the principles of liberty and freedom. They do not expect public
 acknowledgement for their work, but they do expect and deserve their
government's protection of their covert status.

For the good of our country, we ask you to please stand up for every man and woman who works for the U.S. intelligence community and help protect
their ability to live their cover.

Sincerely yours,



_____________________________________

Larry C. Johnson, former Analyst, CIA


JOINED BY:

Mr. Brent Cavan, former Analyst, CIA

Mr. Vince Cannistraro, former Case Officer, CIA

Mr. Michael Grimaldi, former Analyst, CIA

Mr. Mel Goodman, former senior Analyst, CIA

Col. W. Patrick Lang (US Army retired), former Director, Defense Humint
Services, DIA

Mr. David MacMichael, former senior estimates officer, National
Intelligence Council, CIA

Mr. James Marcinkowski, former Case Officer, CIA

Mr. Ray McGovern, former senior Analyst and PDB Briefer, CIA

Mr. Jim Smith, former Case Officer, CIA

Mr. William C. Wagner, former Case Officer, CIA



http://www.crooksandliars.com/stories/2005/07/19/
ciaAgentsLetterToUsSenateAndHouse.html



------------------------------------- You are subscribed as
jcasserly@xxxxxxxxxxx To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


------------------------------------- You are subscribed as
jhunker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/






-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/