[IP] Blood on the Political Waters
From Capitol Hill Blue
Opinion
Blood on the Political Waters
By BONNIE ERBE
Sep 6, 2004, 18:47
OK, America, get over it. Admit it: We love attack politics. The bigger
and meaner the lies, the more spellbound we become. We absorb baseless
charges, are drawn to them and even select our candidates in response
to them, rather than dismiss them as the gutter trash we know them to
be. We feign horror, but hypnotically follow just like kittens hooked
on dancing, hanging strings. If the Republican primary for the open
U.S. Senate seat in Florida didn't prove this point, then nothing ever
will.
Former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Mel Martinez pulled
ahead of former Rep. Bill McCollum after polls showed Martinez trailing
just days earlier. Martinez won by a surprising 45 percent-to-31
percent margin. How'd he do it? According to The Washington Post, by
painting a solid conservative (one viewed by party higher-ups as too
conservative to win the general election) as "the new darling of the
extreme homosexuals" (as opposed to, perhaps, moderate homosexuals?)
and other unmentionable sinners.
McCollum, gay-friendly? Carson Kressley, he's not.
Middle-of-the-road? Please. While in Congress, he voted to ban
late-term abortions and to bar adults from helping to transport minors
seeking abortions. He supported the balanced-budget amendment and the
line-item veto. He voted to ban gay adoptions in D.C., to prohibit
burning the U.S. flag and to end preferential treatment by race in
college admissions. No free-spender, gay-rights supporter or civil
libertarian he.
And yet, Martinez painted him as such because McCollum supported
protections for gays in a hate-crimes bill that later failed. Would
Martinez have voted no? (That it's OK to murder or harass gays, but not
persons of color?)
Florida Republicans were so upset with Martinez over these and other
attacks on McCollum (for supporting stem-cell research _ a centrist
position) that former Sen. Connie Mack wrote to 1,500 Florida GOP
activists, saying Martinez's campaign "sunk to a new low in Florida"
that would only "doom our party in November" (again, quoting the Post).
Wake up, Sen. Mack. Those doom days are over. Martinez's attacks won't
"doom the party." They'll help "undecideds" make up their minds and
raise turnout. Look at what they did for Martinez.
When I spent time in Rome, I marveled at what seemed to be a fairly
common phenomenon. Whenever there was a loud car or motorcycle crash,
crowds would gather out of nowhere to marvel at the mess. The Italian
love of blood and gore seemed such a contrast, coming from the same
society that gave us Michelangelo, Bellaggio and da Vinci. (Of course,
the Coliseum was the site where Christians were fed to the lions, too,
but whatever.)
In our society, there is no such contrast. We just love a good fight.
Why else would wrestling be one of the top draws on cable television?
I'm not sure there ever was an attack-free era in American politics.
The two parties certainly had better superficial relations when I
covered Congress in the 1980s than they do now (party leaders visibly
revile each other these days). Former House Speaker "Tip" O'Neill,
D-Mass., and onetime Republican leader Bob Michel of Illinois would
disagree mightily in floor debates over issues, but go arm-in-arm to
the golf course when it was all over. Maybe it was an act. But in
recent times the GOP has perfected the "art of the skewer." Democrats
(not the 527 groups, but the candidates themselves) seem stubbornly if
not self-destructively committed to playing Nice Guy or Nice Gal, as
the case may be.
Sen. John Kerry is finally getting hip. But it may be too late.
He has brought former President Bill Clinton's top attack dogs into his
campaign, and their influence was obvious in Kerry's late-night attack
last Thursday at the close of the Republican National Convention.
Al Gore played the nice guy _ and look where it got him. Clinton was
craftier. He could attack with the best of them and make it seem as if
he wasn't. In less than two months, we'll know whether Kerry has it in
him to fight an opponent much more nimble, adroit and well-funded than
the Viet Cong.
© Copyright 2004 Capitol Hill Blue
Fair Use Notice
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not
always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are
making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice
issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the
material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for
research and educational purposes. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner.
<http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/printer_5194.shtml>
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/