[IP] Microsoft Patents The Obvious (Again)
Begin forwarded message:
From: Barry Ritholtz <ritholtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: September 7, 2004 6:00:56 AM EDT
To: Dave Farber <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Microsoft Patents The Obvious (Again)
Hey Dave,
Came across this over the weekend; IPers may find it interesting.
Barry L. Ritholtz
Chief Market Strategist
Maxim Group
britholtz@xxxxxxxxxxxx
(212) 895-3614
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Big Picture: A blog of capital markets, geopolitics, with a dash
of film!
http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/
Microsoft Patents The Obvious (Again)
http://www.braingia.org/webnotes/index.php?
title=microsoft_patents_the_obvious_again&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
Looks like Microsoft has yet again patented plainly obvious
technologies that have existed for years and years. No, I'm not
talking about their patent of the sudo command
(http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/04/08/20/221230.shtml?tid=155&tid=172).
This time Microsoft has been granted a patent for nothing less than
using your keyboard to navigate a web page!
Patent 6,785,865
(http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?
Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/
srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,785,865.WKU.&OS=PN/6,785,865&RS=PN/
6,785,865) - "Discoverability and navigation of hyperlinks via tabs."
From the abstract, "A user may discover and navigate among hyperlinks
through the use of a keyboard. For example, a user may press a tab key
to discover and navigate to a first hyperlink that is part of a
hypertext document. The first hyperlink is, in response, given focus
and a focus shape is drawn around the text or graphics for the hot
region of the hyperlink. If the user again presses the tab key, the
next hyperlink is given focus and a focus shape..."
That's nice, seeing as we've been using that for years in just about
every browser that ever existed. That's one of the primary methods
that one uses navigate when using the Lynx browser. I'm somewhat
surprised that Microsoft hasn't attempted to patent HTML itself.
It doesn't stop there. Patent 6,784,354
(http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?
Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/
srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,784,354.WKU.&OS=PN/6,784,354&RS=PN/
6,784,354) - "Generating a music snippet." Yes, that's right.
My question is: Where does this all end? At what point has everything
been patented? It's quite obvious that no amount of prior art matters.
Likewise, the invention being plainly obvious doesn't seem to matter
either. I wonder if there is a patent on the wheel.
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/