<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[IP] King Cotton, Meet King Copyright by Sterling Newberry





Begin forwarded message:

From: Jim Balter <jim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: August 15, 2004 4:34:15 PM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: King Cotton, Meet King Copyright by Sterling Newberry

http://www.bopnews.com/archives/001265.html#1265

In business they call it the "first law of holes". If you are in a hole, stop digging.

Here is something very simple that people could do to stop digging the hole we are in with respect to information and its ownership.

Stop using the phrase "Intellectual Property". Under the US constitution, there is no such thing:

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

That US law flagrantly violates this is immaterial to the constitutionality. That power enforces these violations of the constitution is immaterial to the one right which ordinary citizens have in the matter: the right to speak the truth. There is no such thing as Intellectual Property under the US Constitution.

What phrase should one use? Intellectual Capital. The result of discoveries and writings is based on an exclusive use, this is a framework, not of property, but of capital. Property implies perpetuity - one buys property and it belongs to you and your heirs forever. The constitution does not authorize such a grant.

By calling it "property" the battle of those who are raiding the commons is already won: it makes the expectations of the outcome the same as the outcome of owning a house. This is not the analogy that the constitution draws. In fact, the constitution makes clear that the enforcement of exclusivity is a power of the people - because the constitution can only have powers which come from the people - and not in the work itself. It also can do so only for the purpose of promoting the Arts and Science. Thus the right of creating "artificial scarcity" of a work - by withdrawing it from the public - is not intrinsically assured. After all, how does it help the arts and sciences if people are not able to procur information?

...

--
<J Q B>

-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/