<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[IP] Tough road for patent-busters





Begin forwarded message:

From: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxx>
Date: July 20, 2004 5:01:01 AM EDT
To: David Farber <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: jason@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IP] Tough road for patent-busters

Hi Dave,
You circulated an AP article on EFF's patent-busting campaign, <http://www.eff.org/patent/>, that used some misleading statistics on the re-examination process. Compared with the number of re-exam requests filed, we think the past success rate for the procedure is pretty good:

From: Jason Schultz <jason@xxxxxxx>

Statistics from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
show that 90 percent of reexamination requests are granted.  They also
show that 72 percent of granted requests result in either revocation or
narrowing of patent claims.  I'd say this gives EFF fairly good odds in
our campaign, especially with all the help we're receiving from pro
bono patent attorneys, volunteer prior art searchers, and the public.

<http://research.yale.edu/lawmeme/yjolt/modules.php? name=News&file=article&sid=2>
<http://econwpa.wustl.edu:8089/eps/io/papers/0303/0303009.pdf>

I'd also note that while Acacia is now targeting big broadcasters, it earned its place on our most-wanted list for targeting small companies, many of whom couldn't defend themselves.

Thanks.
--Wendy

Subject: [IP] Tough road for patent-busters
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/biztech/07/16/busting.patents.ap/ index.html


Tough road for patent-busters



SAN JOSE, California (AP) -- A small company called Acacia
ResearchCorp. went after some of the biggest names in broadcasting
last month,suing nine companies for an estimated $100 million for
allegedlyviolating its patent on streaming video.

That earned Acacia a spot on what the Electronic Frontier
Foundationconsiders a top 10 list of intellectual property ignominy:
patents theonline civil liberties group is seeking to strike down as
unwarrantedand harmful to innovation.

"Good luck," said Paul Ryan, Acacia's chief executive. "Their
chancesare pretty remote."

Part fighting words. Part truth.

Only 614 of the nearly 7 million existing patents have been
revoked,according to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Some 3,927
patentshave been narrowed since the agency began conducting
re-examinations in1981.



--
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx || wendy@xxxxxxx
phone: 415.436.9333 x 125 // cell: 914.374.0613 // fax: 415.436.9993
Staff Attorney, Electronic Frontier Foundation
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
Chilling Effects: http://www.chillingeffects.org/

-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/