Re: [ga] Spamming
At 18:33 21/03/04, Kim Davies wrote:
J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
Untrue.
ICANN pretends to share in the technical govenance of the Internet. As
such it operates the IANA functions. IANA registers the parameters of
the Internet technology - that IETF or other specify. One of these
parameters is the "MX" DNS RR. It therefore falls into the responsbility
of Vint Cerf or/and John Klensin to make the ICANN BoD to solve the spam
issue in entering a new RR (I suggest "NX") to indicate the IP address of
the no-spam mail server related to a domain name. The same way as they
adopted the funny "XN" for IDNA.
How ridiculous. ICANN should not usurp the role of the IETF and IESG in
developing technical protocols, just because they happen to maintain the
database of protocol assignments. As I have heard many times recently,
IANA "operates the spreadsheet" rather than devising the numbers that go in it.
What is also ridiculous is the idea that some kind of second MX designed
for "no spam" would have any appreciable impact on the problem.
:-)
I suggest you do not use such big words when commenting what is not said.
You will owe me a beer the day you will agree by your own with what I said.
jfc