Re: [ga] VeriSign sues ICANN --- time for ICANN to reassign the registry?

To: George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ga] VeriSign sues ICANN --- time for ICANN to reassign the registry?
From: James Seng <jseng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 08:43:03 +0800
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, discuss-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040227001427.6342.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040227001427.6342.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

What's the current .com .net contract looks like? Can ICANN give 30daysnotice and be done with it?


George Kirikos wrote:

Hello,

See the lawsuit info at:

http://biz.yahoo.com/djus/040226/1629001168_1.html
http://news.com.com/2100-1038-5165982.html

among other venues. Is it time for ICANN to finally end its
relationship with VeriSign? I'd like to see a tender on the front of
ICANN's website tomorrow, for applications to run the .com/net
registry. Application fee = $0. Have the applications posted for all to
see. Make VeriSign serve us, not the other way around.

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
http://www.kirikos.com/

References:
- [ga] VeriSign sues ICANN --- time for ICANN to reassign the registry?
  - From: George Kirikos

Prev by Date: Re: [ga] VeriSign sues ICANN --- time for ICANN to reassign the registry?
Next by Date: Re: [ga] VeriSign sues ICANN --- time for ICANN to reassign the registry?
Previous by thread: Re: [ga] VeriSign sues ICANN --- time for ICANN to reassign the registry?
Next by thread: Re: [ga] VeriSign sues ICANN --- time for ICANN to reassign the registry?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread