Re: [ga] ICANN Board postponing further sTLDs
Your logic escapes me, and I suspect most of us.
Shed those rose colored glasses (break them). Take a look at reality,
because reality is the way it is.
Almost everything is based upon revenue - I'm sorry to break the
that news to you, but that is really the way it is.
I grew up in the 60's; the flower power era. However, I figured it out
all by myself. Think about it. There are motives that don't match
the way you think it should be . . .
Thanks,
Tuesday, October 28, 2003, 9:42:09 AM, J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin
<jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JFCJM> On 15:25 28/10/03, Don Brown said:
>>Who benefits economically from not launching additional TLDs. Follow the
>>money . .
JFCJM> Yes?
JFCJM> the actual point is that there is _NO_money in names.
JFCJM> The money is in what people will accept you do with them.
JFCJM> The absudity is that ICANN wants to make believe shadows have a value (a
JFCJM> name is an IP address shadow).
JFCJM> But never mind, the way IPv6.001 numbering scheme is designed ... it
will
JFCJM> need a UMS (unique machine system) copied on the DNS in order to know
that
JFCJM> 00100100010001000111000100101000100010001111000000000000001
JFCJM> is right now the same machine as:
JFCJM> 00110010111011001001000100010011111001110101011100111001000
JFCJM> just because they do not want to allocate one host sub-number by
JFCJM> registrant. As if you had one different mobile ttelephone number per
JFCJM> carrier you may use....
JFCJM> And wait for the application of IDNA and "internationalized" mail names.
JFCJM> Dont' be afraid the ICANN system is not ready to die. Plenty of
occasions
JFCJM> to make money with the wind.
JFCJM> jfc
----
Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
donbrown_l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55 (972) 788-2364 Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate
----