Re: [ga] Discrimination against the visually impaired?
I don't think this is or should be within ICANN's jurisdiction. Handicap
legislation is properly the job of legislatures. Indeed, there is a lot
of such legislation, and it may be violated by this....
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, George Kirikos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Verisign's WLS site:
>
> http://www.nextregistrationrights.com/
>
> there's a requirement that one enter a code, before placing an order
> (ostensibly, to reduce robotic attempts to "mine" the service).
> However, this also means that the visually impaired will not be able to
> "protect their domain" or speculate on domains they don't own!
>
> E-gold.com has a system that offers the choice of either a visual or an
> audible test, thereby allowing the visually impaired access.
>
> With 7 to 10 million people affected in the US alone:
>
> http://www.afb.org/info_document_view.asp?documentid=1529
>
> perhaps WLS should be delayed until a more inclusive system is
> implemented?
>
> I would think that ICANN Board Members, whose heads are in the sand so
> very often, would be sympathetic to the plight of the blind.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> George Kirikos
> http://www.kirikos.com/
>
--
Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | froomkin@xxxxxx
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm
-->It's very hot here.<--