From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 7:13 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Glen de Saint Géry; Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG
Maybe I’m not understanding the proposed
change. Does adding “Upon
adoption of either the Recommendations from the ccNSO policy development
process on the introduction and delegation of IDN ccTLDs” not mean that the
JIG effectively closes on Nov 16, the date the IDN ccTLD fast-track starts?
Stéphane
Le 31/10/09 01:09, « Gomes, Chuck » <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
a écrit :
Glen,
Let's make sure this is on our agenda for 23 Nov. In the
meantime, in my opinion, the change looks pretty benign to me. Does
anyone think differently?
Chuck
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 3:01 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG
Forwarded
From:
Bart Boswinkel
Hi
Glen,
Included the proposed updated charter for the JIG WG. Could you forward
it to the GNSO Council and request to adopt the charter as well?
The change is last paragraph. Proposed closing date is now either
adoption of IDN ccPDP recommendations or adoption of new gTLD
application Guidebook.
Kind regards,
Bart