RE: [council] NCA Assignments
I was sleeping when you sent this Avri; if not, I would have responded.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 5:06 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] NCA Assignments
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have not heard from any of the other SG representative on
> the subject of NCA assignment.
>
> I will run the lottery shortly unless I hear that people have
> reached agreement.
>
> Using alphabetical order for the picks, the names will be ordered:
>
> 1. Olga
> 2. Terry
>
> Using alphabetical order for the assignments,
>
> 1st name picked goes to Contracted Parties House 2nd name
> picked goes to Non Contracted Parties House
>
> thanks
>
> a.
>
>
>
> On 8 Oct 2009, at 00:53, Avri Doria wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks Kristina.
> >
> > Assuming the NCSG agrees, it remains for the Contracted
> Parties House
> > to agree or not to the assignment of Andrei. If they do, I
> assume the
> > assignment of Olga as the non voting just falls out.
> >
> > I am in the UK, and about to go to sleep after a longs
> day's flight.
> > I will hold off running the random selection until I hear back from
> > folks tomorrow.
> >
> > a.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7 Oct 2009, at 16:08, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >>
> >> On behalf of the Commercial Stakeholder Group, I write to
> advise that
> >> Terry's preference to be assigned to the Non-Contracted
> Parties House
> >> is acceptable to us. I communicated this information yesterday to
> >> the NCSG point person on the issue. As no other SG has yet posted
> >> any assignment-related information, we are posting to the Council
> >> list in the hope of facilitating Council completion of the
> assignment
> >> process in the previously agreed upon timeframe.
> >>
> >> K
> >>
> >
> >
>
>