RE: [council] Whois "misrepresentation study" meeting
I am all for openness and transparency but we also have to be careful
not to make our activities so cumbersome that we cannot get things done
within a reasonable time frame.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 11:54 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] Whois "misrepresentation study" meeting
> Yes, I am listening to it now. And it does appear to be an
> experts only by-invitation only meeting for the purpose you mention.
> I wonder though, since the studies have grown beyond their
> original proposers, whether the range of voices at the
> meeting was adequate. I also wonder whether it is is
> appropriate for there to be meetings held with some
> participants in a council activity without others at least
> being informed and given a chance to request an invitation
> for their experts.
> I am grateful that the mp3 was made available so at least
> thee is some transparency into the process.
> On 18 Aug 2009, at 11:45, Tim Ruiz wrote:
> > I believe this was the call with study proposers to give an
> > of the RFP that would be used to do an analysis of the
> Subject study.
> > So likely only relevant proposers were invited.
> > Tim
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [council] Whois "misrepresentation study" meeting
> > From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
> > Date: Tue, August 18, 2009 9:54 am
> > To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Hi,
> > Just found this in the calendar.
> > Was this meeting announced?
> > Did it have an agenda?
> > Was it an open meeting, as all GNSO meetings are unless
> > closed over personal privacy concerns, or was it by invitation only?
> > If I knew of this and it just did not register, I apologize, but I
> > really do not know what it was about.
> > I will listen to the audio, but am looking for some context.
> > http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-whois-20090810.mp3
> > thanks
> > a.