RE: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments

To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:16:07 -0500
In-reply-to: <25BDBB9029E94E28AB52640D6A3AAA5C@PSEVO>
List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <494A2145.80904@xxxxxxxxxx> <C57013C4.29D6%stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx> <25BDBB9029E94E28AB52640D6A3AAA5C@PSEVO>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AclhF581pgNpKOuxzUeE52bh2ddUSQAANOIgAAClC+A=
Thread-topic: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments

We probably should confirm with Doug whether Staff will handle it that way if it does not come out to even head counts for airfare and/or per diem per constiutency?

Chuck

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 8:58 AM
To: 'Council GNSO'
Subject: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments

Stephane wrote:
So if that's the case why not just stick with the "we have a total amount X for travel support for the GNSO and we divide that by the number of constituencies"?

I agree 100%.

Philip

References:
- Re: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments
  - From: Jordi Iparraguirre
- Re: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments
  - From: Stéphane Van Gelder
- [council] Travel policy draft and other comments
  - From: Philip Sheppard

Prev by Date: Re: [council] Motion regarding New gTLDs
Next by Date: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments
Previous by thread: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments
Next by thread: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread