[council] Travel policy draft and other comments

To: "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments
From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:58:15 +0100
In-reply-to: <C57013C4.29D6%stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <494A2145.80904@xxxxxxxxxx> <C57013C4.29D6%stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AclhF581pgNpKOuxzUeE52bh2ddUSQAANOIg

Stephane wrote:
So if that's the case why not just stick with the "we have a total amount X for travel support for the GNSO and we divide that by the number of constituencies"?

I agree 100%.

Philip

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments
  - From: Gomes, Chuck

References:
- Re: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments
  - From: Jordi Iparraguirre
- Re: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments
  - From: Stéphane Van Gelder

Prev by Date: RE: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments
Next by Date: Re: [council] Motion regarding New gTLDs
Previous by thread: RE: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments
Next by thread: RE: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread