<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [At-Large] ICANN Seeks Public Comments on Proposed Termsof Reference for Independent Review of the At-Large AdvisoryCmt. (and At-Large structures)



While the timing is important, what is critical is relevance, and the  
approach/methodology used.  We also need to ensure that this review is 
useful in a way that responds to ALAC's needs and priorities (e.g 
allowing for more direct representation), it is therefore important that 
we actively participate in the process from the onset, to also ensure 
that basic guiding principles (transparency, impartiality, etc) are 
adhered to.

alice

carlos aguirre wrote:
>
> I think, particularly, the revision arrives behind schedule or very 
> early, but certainly out of time . ALAC has got another structure now, 
> with the inclusion of RALOs, and in fact those RALOs haven't started 
> to work yet.
>
>
>       Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     From: /jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>     To: /Adam Peake <ajp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>/
>     CC: /alac@xxxxxxxxx/
>     Subject: /Re: [At-Large] ICANN Seeks Public Comments on Proposed
>     Termsof Reference for Independent Review of the At-Large
>     AdvisoryCmt. (and At-Large structures)/
>     Date: /Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:17:20 -0400/
>
>     I totally agree with you Adam - that's what I'd love to come out
>     of the review.
>
>     Franck, the RALO structure for ALAC was set up a while ago. We
>     just got the RALOs going after 3 years, but the review is overdue
>     (per Adam's response), so it seems weird, but it's just the timing.
>
>     Jacqueline
>
>     Quoting Adam Peake <ajp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>     > because ICANN's bylaws require all supporting
>     > organizations, councils etc to be reviewed on a
>     > regular basis, and the ALAC structures haven't
>     > yet been reviewed, and are behind schedule for
>     > review
>     > <http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#IV-4>.
>     >
>     > This might be a positive step. With RALOs in
>     > place, an outcome might be to allow for more
>     > direct representation rather than the current
>     > rather weak and indirect liaison structure.
>     > Perhaps...
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     >
>     > Adam
>     >
>     >
>     > At 9:28 PM +1200 4/5/07, Franck Martin wrote:
>     >> Why does ICANN set up a new structure with RALOs
>     >> and then decide to review it, before they even
>     >> did any work?
>     >>
>     >> I'm certainly confused here.
>     >>
>     >> On 4/5/07, Denise Michel
>     >> <<mailto:denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx>denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx>
>     >> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> Dear members of the At-Large community:
>     >>
>     >> Please be advised that, on 30 March 2006, ICANN posted for public
>     >> comments proposed Terms of Reference detailing questions that would
>     >> guide the independent review of ICANN's At-Large Advisory
>     Committee and
>     >> global At-Large structures and processes
>     >>
>     
> <<http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-30mar07.htm>http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-30mar07.htm
>     
> <http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-30mar07.htm%3Ehttp://icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-30mar07.htm>>.
>     >> The public
>     >> comment period will conclude on 29 April 2007. Please send
>     comments to:
>     >> <<mailto:alac-review-tor@xxxxxxxxx>alac-review-tor@xxxxxxxxx>.
>     >> View comments at:
>     >>
>     
> <<http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/>http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/
>     
> <http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/%3Ehttp://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/>>.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> --
>     >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>     >> Franck Martin
>     >> <mailto:franck.martin@xxxxxxxxx>franck.martin@xxxxxxxxx
>     >> "Toute connaissance est une réponse à une question"
>     >> G. Bachelard
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> ALAC mailing list
>     >> ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     >>
>     
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>     >>
>     >> www.alac.icann.org
>     >> www.icannalac.org
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > ALAC mailing list
>     > ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     >
>     
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>     >
>     > www.alac.icann.org
>     > www.icannalac.org
>     >
>
>
>     -- 
>     Jacqueline A. Morris
>     www.jacquelinemorris.com
>
>
>     >_______________________________________________
>     >ALAC mailing list
>     >ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     
> >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>     >
>     >www.alac.icann.org
>     >www.icannalac.org
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sé uno de los primeros a testar el Windows Live Messenger beta. ¡Haz 
> click aquí! <http://g.msn.com/8HMAESAR/2731??PS=47575>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> www.alac.icann.org
> www.icannalac.org



_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org

www.alac.icann.org
www.icannalac.org