Re: [alac] ccNSO liaison
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:03:24 +0100, "Roberto Gaetano"
<alac_liaison@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I was under the impression that we already discussed this, and there was no
>objection to Erick.
True, this is the last call.
>Any news for the GNSO Liaison?
Honestly, given the names we have as applicants, I'd wait for one of the new
appointees.
>We also have to review the other liaison and functions (Board Liaison,
>Chair, vice Chairs, etc.). I have no idea of what the bylaws say, but I
>would expect a revision yearly, after the new members have joined. At least,
>this is what the Board and SOs do. We can either do it now (I mean in the
>next days, but we probably had to do it at our meeting here in CT, if we
>take the example of the Board and SOs)
It was my intention to discuss this in the internal meeting tomorrow, when
we discuss internal reorganization. But of course any decision about new
appointments should happen only after having moved the discussion to the
list.
Especially, I would like to get confirmation whether everyone is happy to
have me as Chair, or would rather change. I wish to continue and I think it
could be good to continue having the Chair as WGIG member from a political /
outreach point of view, but I need more support from the group in terms of
practical organizing (so we should reassess vice Chairs too).
--
vb. [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<------
http://bertola.eu.org/ <- Vecchio sito, nuovo toblòg...