Hi, * Christoph Ludwig [07-10-25 12:26:04 +0200] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:08:52PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
Is there at least anyone but me who uses gpgme instead of classic method with this error-prone commandline config? ;)
Mutt comes with pgp and gpg samples that simply work out of the box... :)
actually, you configure it in the gnupg config files rather than .muttrc (don't ask me why). Add to gpgsm.conf a line
encrypt-to 0x................
whith the dots replaced by the fingerprint of your key.
Well, this is one way. The other is to change the sample config for gnupg to include -R <yourid> so that you have it on a per-application basis.
With mutt, of course you even change these settings as usual via hooks to include -R or not (using handy $my_ variables this is easy).
Rocco