On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 05:43:44PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> What about something like this:
>
> folder-hook . my_hdr From: address_a
> folder-hook =lists my_hdr From: address_b
> send-hook '!~f address_b' 'my_hdr From: address_a'
> send-hook '~C @example.com' 'my_hdr From: address_c'
>
I couldn't get this one to work, but
send-hook '~f address_a !~C @example.com' etc
seems to work.
> folder-hook . 'set my_stophook=no; my_hdr From: address_a'
> folder-hook =lists 'set my_stophook=yes; my_hdr From: address_b'
> send-hook . \
> '`[ $my_stophook == yes ] && echo set my_stophook || echo my_hdr
> From: address_a`'
> send-hook '~C @example.com' 'my_hdr From: address_c'
This one didn't appear to work either; with both, the send-hook still overrode
the folder-hook.
> Of course, you may want to do something a little simpler, and a little
> more effective than using a folder-hook to set your return address.
> Personally, I'd do something like this:
>
> send-hook . my_hdr From: address_a
> send-hook ~l my_hdr From: address_b
> send-hook @example.com my_hdr From: address_c
I think I saw this one before; it works, but it means I need to keep track of
the lists I'm subscribed to (rather than just filtering everything sent to my
list address into a separate folder).
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 03:50:57PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> What I've done is nest them, so that a set of folder-hooks define
> the set of send-hooks and/or message-hooks to be used within that
> folder. It looks a little complicated at first, but it works quite
> well.
This occurred to me, but I couldn't get the quoting right.
Thanks, both of you.
--
Benjamin A'Lee <bma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://subvert.org.uk/~bma/
"Now, now, dear man, this is not the time to be making enemies." - Voltaire,
on his deathbed when a priest asked him to "renounce Satan"
Attachment:
pgpBm4zpMnHBJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature