also sprach Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2007.10.10.1305 +0100]:
> That doesn't make much sense to me. If I have a read message and I say
> "toggle-new", why would mutt assume that I really wanted to
> "toggle-old"? Perhaps what's needed is a different function?
Sure. I am not talking about toggle-{new,old}, just about the
behaviour I expect. It makes no sense ever to mark a message new if
I already distinguish between new and old.
> Ahhh, right. I guess this gets down to exactly what "toggle-new"
> is supposed to mean. At the moment, obviously, it means "if not
> new, make it new, else if new, make it not-new", which is a very
> straightforward use of the definition of the word "toggle".
Except it's a tri-state and you cannot toggle tri-states. You only
rotate them. :)
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
if con is the opposite of pro, is congress the opposite of progress?
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)