On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 09:44:26PM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Thursday, August 30 at 08:33 PM, quoth Patrick Shanahan: > > * Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [08-30-07 20:07]: > >> On Thursday, August 30 at 07:41 PM, quoth Patrick Shanahan: > >>> * Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [08-30-07 17:44]: > >>>> In general, what mutt renders is the piped output of the programs > >>>> listed as handlers for the specific MIME-types. So, if w3m can get > >>>> images to display when used like this: > >>>> > >>>> $ cat foo.html | w3m -dump -T text/html >foo.txt; > >>>> $ cat foo.txt > >>>> > >>>> Then YES, mutt can display that. (as it happens, elinks can spit out > >>>> xterm color commands, and mutt can thus display color elinks output, > >>>> because the above command sequence *works* for elinks color) > >>> > >>> grep w3m ~/.mutt/mutt.mailcap > >>> text/html; w3m -F -dump -T text/html %s; nametemplate=%s.html; > >>> copiousoutput > > > > I use w3m to display html msgs in mutt via above. Shows columns, > > frames, etc... > > ...yes? The question was about getting it to display *images*, not > frames and columns. w3m can be compiled to display images in an xterm. > > ~Kyle > -- > The government is like a baby's alimentary canal, with a happy > appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other. > -- Ronald Reagan -- Matt Okeson-Harlow Sen gutoj malgrandaj maro ne ekzistus
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature