<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: OT: offending sig + headers



Am 2007-05-17 20:45:54, schrieb Derek Martin:
> that's true, I am arrogant.  But I'm also right.  My methods minimize
> the time spent reviewing unwanted mail, while also GUARANTEEING ZERO
> LOST MAIL WITH 100% CERTAINTY.  No other anti-spam methodology can do

This is not right, since IF someone want to send you quickly a message
YOU LOST THIS MESSAGE and OFFEND THE SENDER!  --  You lost!

If someone do this with me, I blacklist the person and will not more
respond to him/her in the future.

Since I am Debian GNU/Linux Consultant, methods like yours are annoying
and all other them serieuse.  I would never bother peoples with such BS.

Greetings
    Michelle Konzack
    Systemadministrator
    Tamay Dogan Network
    Debian GNU/Linux Consultant


-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917                  ICQ #328449886
                   50, rue de Soultz         MSN LinuxMichi
0033/6/61925193    67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)

Attachment: signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature