Re: Poll: Quoting behaviour
On 2007-03-19, Rocco Rutte <pdmef@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Gary Johnson [07-03-19 15:35:39 -0700] wrote:
> > On 2007-03-19, Angel Olivera <redondos@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 19 2007 21:19, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> >> > 1) Introduce $quote_empty that makes this behaviour configurable
> >> > 2) Restore the original behaviour for the f=f handler
> >> > 3) Do 1 + 2
>
> [...]
>
> >> Not only 2, because I happen to find this a very useful feature for
> >> inline replies. (No more empty lines removal done by the editor)
>
> > I would use only 2, but 3 seems like a good idea. If 3, would
> > $quote_empty apply to non-f=f messages as well?
>
> Yes.
Thanks.
It also occurred to me that I'm not clear on just what "original
behavior" means. I had assumed that "original behavior" meant per
my patch-1.5.5.1.gj.stuff_all_quoted.3 patch or the equivalent. I
definitely don't like the unpatched behavior of 1.5.12. I haven't
tried the latest 1.5.14 f=f handler.
Regards,
Gary
--
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
garyjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Mobile Broadband Division
http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ | Spokane, Washington, USA