Re: [POLL] Attachment counting

To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [POLL] Attachment counting
From: markus reichelt <ml@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 20:10:04 +0200
In-reply-to: <20060501172004.GA18790@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-users-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
Organization: still stuck in reorganization mode
References: <20060501160240.GA6743@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060501172004.GA18790@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

* Derek Martin <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > 8. Would you consider it a loss for the attachment counter to be
> >    removed completely?
> 
> Absolutely.

I agree.

-- 
left blank, right bald

Attachment: pgpRAMZJ1W9o0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- [POLL] Attachment counting
  - From: David Champion
- Re: [POLL] Attachment counting
  - From: Derek Martin

Prev by Date: Re: Reading UTF-8 Mail (was Re: e-mail encoding/formatting)
Next by Date: Re: e-mail encoding/formatting
Previous by thread: Re: [POLL] Attachment counting
Next by thread: Re: [POLL] Attachment counting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread