Re: why setting 'sig_on_top' is not recommended?
Zhiqiang Ye <yezhiqiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I don't why [sig on top] is not recommended. Can anyone help me out?
One of the many possible reasons: some MUAs "know" the signature is just
noise, and provide a setting for the user to suppress it. If you include
anything after the signature, it appears to be part /of/ the signature, and
will therefore be similarly suppressed -- the user will never see anything you
include after the signature.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPL'ed software available at: http://pyropus.ca/software/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------