Re: mutt - slow mbox'es
Hello David,
> Well, if you feel like hacking up Mutt support for the mbx format,
> you can have the only mailbox format that performs even better than
> the mbox format. Your other option is to use the IMAP header cache
> with a connection to your local UW-IMAPd (which already supports mbx)
> running on mbx mail stores (which is my setup, minus the header cache -
> I don't need header caching, since I rarely leave my 300 megabyte inbox).
why noone did that already? Are there some numbers available? How many
lines have other dbx implementations? How many man hours would it take
to implement it?
Thomas