* It was Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 02:51:13PM -0500 when David Champion said: > * On 2004.06.25, in <20040625194135.GB8972@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > * "Sami Samhuri" <sami@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > I thought these lists were made so people can post their questions and > > > > those > > > > who would like to respond do so? Maybe I am wrong.... > > > > Indeed they are. However, there are different lists for different topics > > just as with newsgroups. Would you post this same message to a Mutt > > newsgroup, or a Procmail one? Where do you think you would get better > > answers from? > > I think it's fine to leave that to the poster's discretion. Sometimes > posting a filtering question to a mutt list leads to some interesting > approaches or discoveries, not just for the poster, but for others > as well. If you're not interested, stop reading the thread and don't > respond. Certainly don't pummel the poster. Svenning is no fun for > anyone but the svenner. I didn't mean to pummel or be rude at all. Sorry if it seemed that way. I agree that some things mail-related can relate to mutt too. In this case though, where mutt is not related at all it still seems (to me) like the poster would receive more information from a procmail-specific resource. If I find a thread uninteresting I do ignore it. -- Sami Samhuri
Attachment:
pgpzybT5BekL8.pgp
Description: PGP signature