Re: hook conflicts...

[Nicolas Rachinsky <list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

* David Yitzchak Cohen <lists+mutt_users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2004-05-28 17:22 
-0400]:
> It gets worse: if we're in folder1 or folder2, the default folder-hook
> will screw up the send-hooks before we get to the folder1 or folder2
> folder-hooks (but after we've already unhooked the stale send-hooks
> from before).  In other words, something like this should be best,
> if I'm correct:
> 
> folder-hook . 'unhook send-hook; send-hook sweetie "do sweetie stuff"; 
> send-hook . "do default stuff"'
> folder-hook folder1 'unhook send-hook; send-hook sweetie "do sweetie stuff"; 
> send-hook . "do folder1 stuff"'
> folder-hook folder2 'unhook send-hook; send-hook sweetie "do sweetie stuff"; 
> send-hook . "do folder2 stuff"'

I think, you have to change the order of the send-hooks, too. But the
additional unhooks seem neccessary.

Nicolas