On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 04:40:56PM EDT, Matt Price wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 04:11:25PM -0400, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > > On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:53:57PM EDT, Matt Price wrote: > ok, so the big question is solved. How about this problem though: > > send-hook "~C^sugar\.pop@utoronto\.ca" 'set > signature=.mutt/sigs/signature_sweetie ; my_hdr From: Matt > <matt.price@utoronto.\ ca>' > > > what's wrong with this hook? From the manual, I would think it would > only match a message with sugar.pop@xxxxxxxxxxx as the ONLY recipient > (because of the ^). Instead, it matches all messages with > sugar.pop@... as ANY of the recipients. Or am I missing something? > I have also tried it without the ~C (which seems superfluous for a > send-hook) -- but this seemed to make no difference -- neither fixed > nor gave me a syntax error. ~C matches individual addresses in any of the typical recipient headers (To and Cc). The "^" anchor simply means that my.sugar.pop@xxxxxxxxxxx won't match :-) I guess you can split it into two send-hooks: send-hook "~C sugar\.pop@utoronto\.ca" "do sweetie stuff" send-hook "~C !(sugar\.pop@utoronto\.ca)" "do nonsweetie stuff" ...or however you do the second one in GNU regex syntax (basically, matching any nonsweetie addy - I doubt my example works, but at least it makes what I'm trying to do clear ... find the syntax, and you're in business) :-) HTH, - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpQNBiZCpJJa.pgp
Description: PGP signature