G'day David, * David Yitzchak Cohen <lists+mutt_users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [031104 22:52]: > Well, I kinda forgot to include the link for the footnote above [1] ... oops > ;-) > > - Dave > > [1] > http://www.bigfatdave.com/dave/bin/getkeys > Possibly silly question, but are wwwkeys.us.pgp.net www.mandrakesecure.net www.keyserver.net keyservers that _don't_ autosync with each other? The whole point of the keyservers is that they talk to each other and each keyserver has an identical copy of ALL the keys. That way you submit to one and your key appears on all the others. More importantly that is why the sort of functionality you've coded up is not in gpg -- it's just not needed. As an aside you really should drop pgp.net as it is crap^D^D^D^Dnot a particularly good implementation of the OpenPGP standard. In particular it mangles subkeys (BAD dog!) and doesn't allow searching on subkeys (like I use for signing). Try replacing it with subkeys.pgp.net (if you REALLY must use a pgp.net machine) or by preference keyserver.kjsl.com keyserver.bu.edu sks.keyserver.penguin.de sks.dnsalias.net Cheers, S. (Who signs his messages, uses subkeys, has X-Request-PGP headers, uses muttgpg[1], doesn't have a tinfoil hat, hates the old style keyservers which mangled his key, and doesn't care about those people who complain about signed messages[2] ;) ) [1] http://www.liv.ac.uk/~svwright/software/#muttgpg [2] http://www.liv.ac.uk/~svwright/security/signed-mail-rant.html -- European Citizens: Please do a little work to convince the European Parliament to reject software patents. This page explains the issue and provides suggestions for action; take the time to participate. http://swpat.ffii.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature