Re: [PATCH] init.h documentation bug (was: Documentation bug?)

To: Mutt User List <mutt-users@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init.h documentation bug (was: Documentation bug?)
From: Tobias Mummert <doczook@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:04:21 +0200
Cc: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20031013121547.GH21998@xxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Mutt User List <mutt-users@xxxxxxxx>, Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20031013114221.GA2676@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031013121315.GG21998@xxxxxxxx> <20031013121547.GH21998@xxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

Hi René,

thanks a lot for the patch!

* René Clerc [2003-10-13 14:15 +0200]:

> I want the forgotten attachment checker!!!

Thomas? Have you read this?

Watch out: Three exclamation marks... <grin>

> What a coincidence, do you believe that?!?!

Yes, absolutely. The same happens to me now and then.

Best regards from Germany,
Tobias
-- 
BOFH excuse #105:
UPS interrupted the server's power

Attachment: pgpV3idK4o5Cl.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Documentation bug?
  - From: Tobias Mummert
- [PATCH] init.h documentation bug (was: Documentation bug?)
  - From: René Clerc
- Re: [PATCH] init.h documentation bug (was: Documentation bug?)
  - From: René Clerc

Prev by Date: Re: Make unread the same as new
Next by Date: Re: Make unread the same as new
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] init.h documentation bug (was: Documentation bug?)
Next by thread: forgotten attachment checker
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread