RE: [council] Registry Operators

To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [council] Registry Operators
From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:18:14 +1000
Accept-language: en-US, en-AU
Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
In-reply-to: <08D4BD54F2DA4E958846EFB95F4E5C30@PSEVO>
List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3C09D81FAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702B8DD3A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <08D4BD54F2DA4E958846EFB95F4E5C30@PSEVO>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcoEVamrQDRzJvsvTnSkZoe681bdNQAMi52wAACs2aAAF9hbAA==
Thread-topic: [council] Registry Operators

So how does this response help?

I’ll simply proceed with my Registry Service Providers Constituency application and let the Board decide (and wait until the BC veto’s their decision).

Thanks.

Adrian Kinderis

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Tuesday, 14 July 2009 11:55 PM
To: 'Council GNSO'
Subject: RE: [council] Registry Operators

Gentleman,

its an old debate

No no no and no.

References:
- [council] Registry Operators
  - From: Adrian Kinderis
- RE: [council] Registry Operators
  - From: Gomes, Chuck
- RE: [council] Registry Operators
  - From: Philip Sheppard

Prev by Date: [council] GNSO Council resolution 9 July 2009
Next by Date: RE: [council] Registry Operators
Previous by thread: RE: [council] Registry Operators et al
Next by thread: RE: [council] Registry Operators
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread