Re: [council] Motion regarding New gTLDs

To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Motion regarding New gTLDs
From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:33:11 +0100
In-reply-to: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07027CCB3B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AclgTIvUczTaB8CBRNqoTQVagVsgbAAOiGwh
Thread-topic: [council] Motion regarding New gTLDs
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409

Title: Re: [council] Motion regarding New gTLDs

Chuck,

Is this the motion for which I had offered a friendly amendment?

I don’t recognize the text we had agreed upon, but I may be wrong...

Stéphane

Le 17/12/08 14:37, « Gomes, Chuck » <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

Avri,

I just realized that the attached motion regarding the 4-month communication period that I submitted on 21 November has been left off the agenda for our Council meeting tomorrow.

Chuck

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [council] Motion regarding New gTLDs
  - From: Gomes, Chuck
- Re: [council] Motion regarding New gTLDs
  - From: Avri Doria

References:
- [council] Motion regarding New gTLDs
  - From: Gomes, Chuck

Prev by Date: [council] WHOIS Counci discussion MP3 recording December 17, 2008--18:00 UTC
Next by Date: Re: [council] Motion regarding New gTLDs
Previous by thread: Re: [council] Motion regarding New gTLDs
Next by thread: Re: [council] Motion regarding New gTLDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread