Re: Color problem
- To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Color problem
- From: Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:08:02 -0500
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=memoryhole.net; h=date :from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=default; bh=ZDftpiiF/8rNkvL8Eq+7SGqVNY8=; b=RV1c 6uE1BwcOfspFB1mA4et59naXp5pyFmcjvljuxpDjTPQ8mB1HzYzQUilKs4+yKR4A ayw615Ina3UHpUMVNzgTqsw9Cq+RAsRfBL3NVDbkljEfFaf0ft+mVslLcFeZvkP9 aDUeIr+3vi3ZP9IJrZzELbOVj3MeGsnx0uKUUZw=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=lIqrcbZz1zUFQY4RuNO9W3HIkl5AsEQecFmF4NNjYTlB9hsbee/G9e4fhgBrhK7raah8uyU6fYM4ZzKT18vwNAgziJxE8w+X/ijCpilN5TfISY+MolCmozcwQEPDz3MFn+rN8ZM7cLwn3qxHmWxNx4GLhGo5bfBbxpNnUNYB8Iw=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:OpenPGP:User-Agent;
- In-reply-to: <20090603000831.GA10262@xxxxxxxxx>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
- Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Openpgp: id=CA8E235E; url=http://www.memoryhole.net/~kyle/kyle-pgp.asc; preference=signencrypt
- References: <20090603000831.GA10262@xxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-06-01)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On Tuesday, June 2 at 08:08 PM, quoth Ken Weingold:
> I hope I can explain this well. I just built mutt 1.5.19 after using
> 1.5.10 for quite a long time. 1.5.10 was using ncurses 5.2 and 1.5.19
> was compiled using ncurses 5.6 (5.4 is also available). I have new
> mail in bold cyan. In 1.5.19, if I scroll the indicator up over the
> new emails, it unbolds them. Scrolling down over them will make them
> bold again. Any idea why this is happening?
Do you mean that they're un-bolded while the indicator is highlighting
them? Or do you mean that they're un-bolded only if the indicator is
higher up on the list than they are and that when the indicator is
lower in the list they become bolded again?
If it's the former, then that's expected behavior (unfortunately) -
the indicator bar isn't supposed to preserve *any* of the underlying
index formatting. If the latter... that sounds like a bug. Try
reporting it to mutt-dev and see if they have any ideas (my first
guess would be to make sure it's linking against the version of
ncurses that you think it is, e.g. with the ldd tool).
~Kyle
- --
He that never changes his opinions, never corrects his mistakes, will
never be wiser on the morrow than he is today.
-- Tryon Edwards
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!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=ma0x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----