Re: smtp session failed error
- To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: smtp session failed error
- From: Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:52:02 -0500
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=memoryhole.net; h=date :from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=default; bh=db/Iak2rsnb/lgXfDMS2LqTxr64=; b=mr44 JYjpBD7u7Bmi8+XTSfFjJa3fC34HgQma2Y6e0qDM/EA3WJQUrt95B4GxNX4vDHEn BXTnoZqvsmT49r6z1I5w80AeIA/F2WWVBS1Gw8QlMu4NqojvzXejP6dDhxobq0Di zVyaWAhnKGiHeLNl7B6Ev6gJdZ6bsGnSzWqamAw=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=EUeH7yMvtPMW0OCEyOe0FNndCAGzjRJaocVOrBt6cL7qtb7g+KoTRVae1lox1i1EZWqC3Der+013X8Xf9Jc4YXhvUVg8PxnjUiOPUQarTs9u+icc9zf2iChiZjQ9UAO6lm2n/EcOi2ybxZRGHIvYmv+A/LPeKkqoFePGXgdApfE=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:OpenPGP:User-Agent;
- In-reply-to: <R02010500-1049-F37D1DB01E0911DEB080003065B0760E@[10.0.1.6]>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
- Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Openpgp: id=CA8E235E; url=http://www.memoryhole.net/~kyle/kyle-pgp.asc; preference=signencrypt
- References: <R02010500-1049-F37D1DB01E0911DEB080003065B0760E@[10.0.1.6]>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-03-19)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, March 31 at 10:38 AM, quoth Russ Urquhart:
> I am trying to test the sending of an email to myself but i get the
> following error message:
>
> mutt SMTP session failed: 550 5.1.8 invalid/host-not-in-DNS return
> address not allowed
Hmmm, that looks like an error message from your email server. My
guess is they have instituted some sort of rule as an anti-spam
measure, and you're falling afoul of it. It's not entirely clear from
their message whether it's your return address that's upsetting them,
or whether it's your computer's IP address, but since we can only
fiddle with the former, let's assume it's that.
> The mail tries to authenticate, and i think it does, but then i get
> the above message.
Really? Huh. So, assuming you're succesfully authenticating, that
means it's actually an anti-VIRAL measure that you're triggering. Not
that that's important, I suppose, just thinking aloud here.
> I set my hostname to Russ-Urquharts-Computer-2.local as this is what
> the hostname command returned.
That shouldn't matter.
> my username is russurquhart1, my isp is verizon.net. and set the
> incoming and outgoing mail servers according to what i have on my
> other mail clients.
My guess is that the problem is your return address. For historical
reasons, if you don't specify one, mutt guesses your return address
based on your local hostname and your local username. Unless you run
your own mail server, though, mutt's guess is almost certainly
incorrect. You probably just need to specify your *actual* verizon
email address, like so:
set from=russurquhart1@xxxxxxxxxxx
set use_from=yes # this is the default value
In your case, what mutt is probably guessing is:
russurquhart1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, which of course isn't
an email address that Verizon has any interest in allowing. You could
force mutt to guess the correct address by setting your hostname to be
verizon.net, but that wouldn't be a good idea for obvious reasons. :)
~Kyle
- --
The rule is, jam tomorrow and jam yesterday---but never jam today.
-- Lewis Carroll
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!
iEYEARECAAYFAknSPCIACgkQBkIOoMqOI15JDQCgr6ITWB9TDme+0zaXiCzI9MPl
LewAniE5oQtU9VPY6IWG1+o0M3p64ZlG
=h43U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----