Is current shortcut `^' in mutt for `record' works for you?
- To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Is current shortcut `^' in mutt for `record' works for you?
- From: Mikolaj Kucharski <mikolaj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:41:16 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:subject :message-id:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=lOVYDHagGb6aYdQUgmHpbl2ArQujpoARKoqyWble+yk=; b=moKTRkptG+yCNqV/6Sfah172M1fjpiW3/Lma37xBkoxLbuuCcbKMSFMQWMgAifEb9y M/8OSCkRm5vHk6/M0JuAnuBB/HoFr5XUpZ4p3kRjVqgNOinG9gcrc3Uxt8z7N60aAceW jlgDSxON4XPYYRIlcG1U3kSHGtdcvySy50xYM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:mail-followup-to :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent; b=AkYMxs8ifE1yoh+HJ7X81L49wSU5GjToU5C77s9NavsMR0xZsCpolOfm1ejJmbrOUB epQsL1+FXetxMmrOdivOu2b8rCzlPgfKJFiFM2qUBRZKUUzqZ3flGlWYWGPP6FLuM5SQ bAAKVF/yt9/WaI5zQUH+LzPjMvFxvh0z4laBo=
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
- Mail-followup-to: Mikolaj Kucharski <mikolaj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: Mikolaj Kucharski <mikolaj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Hi,
I'm using mutt 1.5.18. I want to use `set record=^' in my .muttrc, but
that doesn't work for me as expected.
I started mutt, opened folder =test1 and then put `:set record=^'. When
replying to email in that folder mutt sets `Fcc: =test1', and that's
correct. Now I'm moving to different folder =test2. Replying in this
folder mutt still sets `Fcc: =test1', that's not correct.
When I start mutt and I have `set record=^' in my .muttrc as mutt didn't
had any folder opened before, `Fcc:' field is always blank when replying
to any message in any folder. That's not correct.
Now, I have following questions.
1. Can anyone reproduce that and confirm?
2. Is anyone aware of that bug already reported in mutt's bug tracking system?
3. Which mailing list is better for reports like that mutt-users or mutt-dev?
Short answers appreciated. Thanks.
Mutt 1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Copyright (C) 1996-2008 Michael R. Elkins and others.
Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'.
Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details.
System: OpenBSD 4.5 (i386)
ncurses: ncurses 5.2.20010224 (compiled with 5.2)
libiconv: 1.11
hcache backend: qdbm 1.8.77
Compile options:
-DOMAIN
-DEBUG
-HOMESPOOL -USE_SETGID -USE_DOTLOCK +DL_STANDALONE
-USE_FCNTL +USE_FLOCK
+USE_POP +USE_IMAP +USE_SMTP +USE_GSS +USE_SSL_OPENSSL -USE_SSL_GNUTLS
+USE_SASL +HAVE_GETADDRINFO
+HAVE_REGCOMP -USE_GNU_REGEX
+HAVE_COLOR +HAVE_START_COLOR +HAVE_TYPEAHEAD +HAVE_BKGDSET
+HAVE_CURS_SET +HAVE_META +HAVE_RESIZETERM
+CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_PGP +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_SMIME -CRYPT_BACKEND_GPGME
-EXACT_ADDRESS -SUN_ATTACHMENT
+ENABLE_NLS -LOCALES_HACK +HAVE_WC_FUNCS +HAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET
+HAVE_LANGINFO_YESEXPR
+HAVE_ICONV -ICONV_NONTRANS -HAVE_LIBIDN +HAVE_GETSID +USE_HCACHE
ISPELL="/usr/local/bin/ispell"
SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail"
MAILPATH="/var/mail"
PKGDATADIR="/usr/local/share/mutt"
SYSCONFDIR="/etc/mutt"
EXECSHELL="/bin/sh"
-MIXMASTER
To contact the developers, please mail to <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>.
To report a bug, please visit http://bugs.mutt.org/.
--
best regards
q#