Re: Clarification on tag-prefix-cond vs. tag-prefix
- To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Clarification on tag-prefix-cond vs. tag-prefix
- From: Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:44:19 -0600
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=memoryhole.net; h=date :from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=default; bh=9TeWNEC8ugcsW8TOvm905k2qQZU=; b=TI1U xkjFoKQP1kJQrx4dQ+feugDkLZ61lS7Qeg2GqahMUhabINPMHh/sU1aeCzAF4lvV nbZz/BsjBKt2rFET6EdmSQ+ZKZwn0fpuED2YcfQoTQDYrCvLphGq4+eFtKRWhsxO oAHKdAWYGZLmwWknv5FGI7x/ksl0hG4GEIf+Bog=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=GD4yANhjjbSJkuCIsxHP5P+BTTzFxwejjmDA+4wN9TjKjkTCToULE9qB/vMm/g6Vn9mK4dg0zjBFVAfj+OJv/texREl4pnne5Z2CNjxm66kvH7iMNeVCHztTmIFOJtrQXbH6U3VkCRy3uwXyeuKzEnpr/H3i1Z4CCpVnQDrjQ5s=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:OpenPGP:User-Agent;
- In-reply-to: <20090215094732.GA6061@herb>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
- Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Openpgp: id=CA8E235E; url=http://www.memoryhole.net/~kyle/kyle-pgp.asc; preference=signencrypt
- References: <20090213031553.GB421@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090213032901.GA1528@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090213182037.GA24437@herb> <20090213205029.GI1528@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090215094732.GA6061@herb>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-27)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, February 15 at 10:47 AM, quoth Jan-Herbert Damm:
> With gratefulness an admiration i studied this manual-worthy
> explanation!
Glad to help!
>> In this case, the match-type-specifier is "~r".
>
> In the manual though they call it "pattern-modifiers".
Meh, a rose by any other name... I just made up
"match-type-specifier", because it made more sense to me as a
description of what that thing does.
> And Simple patterns seem to be specifically associated with certain
> keywords replacing "~,%,=" expressions.
Keywords? Replacing? No, the ~ or % or = don't get *replaced*.
We must be talking past each other here.
~Kyle
- --
Dealing with failure is easy: Work hard to improve. Success is also
easy to handle: You've solved the wrong problem. Work hard to improve.
-- Alan Perlis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!
iEYEARECAAYFAkmYRmIACgkQBkIOoMqOI168QgCfS1n6TQ3K+HZvxqguTtwM8sGB
mY8AoLCOGuBmZOh2mcz6thR6PIaA4IDq
=Vl2b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----