Re: definition of signature separator
- To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: definition of signature separator
- From: Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:16:17 -0600
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=memoryhole.net; h=date :from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=default; bh=n7x7ygcRiNic+6fzUcwU6LNnDTI=; b=l+wN W2sbjyQF+SyH73NHXdSTKQNy1mmhuT3SYQ+fJZhlV7iyWuD8k8Xi/skUlgm2UsYC bRYK7xFrACYGGRmlu86J3dbOhrN8mypEPwVrXauU4Tx9bLIMkGTeo8cHgqCHqlga AhWiPcrb8SKoxmtuEDYtMdzdIzCXX6w21QRRaJo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=lGCLgflNGvU17yQX5ztMzmaTiZ9afKDQalu8e/tB47Yybh1K7nwSRVV5DkZVBTw4/ZbKfNORygVMG62EpYhzLQLXxTgmv+LpA0XIwB0aMUMeBuQWu6lftWnr80uKXEeSpSh6RtKorxD9M7gWg6bM7ivq0+sE66ZM8tcpombDCO8=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:OpenPGP:User-Agent;
- In-reply-to: <20090120141726.GA44088@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
- Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Openpgp: id=CA8E235E; url=http://www.memoryhole.net/~kyle/kyle-pgp.asc; preference=signencrypt
- References: <20090120114559.GA8798@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090120141726.GA44088@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-11)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, January 20 at 06:17 AM, quoth George Davidovich:
>> Mutt separates correctly the text and my signature (from the file
>> ~/.elm/signature) in the body by inserting the '-- \n' line;
>
> Mutt does does indeed do that, but it's syntax hilighting won't work for
> format-flowed messages,
Really?
This message I'm sending right now is a format-flowed message, and as
far as I can tell, the syntax highlighting works perfectly. What makes
you say that it doesn't?
> or for "badly-formatted" signatures containing a blank line
Sure. There are always limits to how much software can read your mind.
> or a line beginning with a 'From' that has had a '>' prepended after
> the fact. ;-)
....?
I haven't used Mutt on a raw mbox in a long time (I use it on either
IMAP or Maildir mailboxes) so I haven't had to deal with that kind of
silliness and I can't see what you're talking about. But what what's
that got to do with signatures?
~Kyle
- --
History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it.
-- Winston Churchill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!
iEYEARECAAYFAkl2IwEACgkQBkIOoMqOI17X1wCgs6QURap/tOsoVh867j9HnO4l
ZisAnRgIdxGMwmOflrK0YpO64soA9NyY
=bm/q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----